Learner progress tracking should lead to a useful question
How attendance, activities, marks and competency evidence can support earlier teacher action without labelling learners.

What it means in practice
Progress tracking is not a larger spreadsheet. It is the disciplined connection of evidence to a decision: who may need another explanation, which competency is not secure, what pattern appears across activities and what should be tried next.
A practical structure
- Show evidence, not unexplained scores.
- Separate missing data from weak performance.
- Keep class and curriculum context visible.
- Allow teachers to record what the numbers cannot explain.
How Asmbly approaches it
Asmbly brings classroom records beside the lesson and class they belong to. Signals should help the teacher decide where to look, while avoiding automatic labels that reduce a learner to a risk category.
What to watch carefully
Small data sets, inconsistent marking and absence can produce misleading patterns. A signal should remain provisional and should never replace professional or pastoral judgement.
Sources and further reading
Connected reading
Global · Guide